Introduction
Since 2011, I have personally lived through a systematic campaign of defamation in South Africa. Over the years, I’ve seen how media platforms and individuals — including Mike Bolhuis, Inna Opperman, Netwerk 24, and Rapport — have, in my view, participated in spreading fake news. This has created what I call the “Derail Peet & Mel Syndrome”: a cycle of sensationalism, personal vendettas, and reputational harm aimed at discrediting me and my family.
What makes this worse is that these defamatory campaigns often operate in a network of corruption. They hide behind shelf companies, use so-called “private investigators,” and exploit South African media platforms to avoid accountability. Despite years of reputational damage, I have yet to see them truly held liable in court or forced to pay meaningful damages.
⸻
Understanding Defamation in South African Law
South African law is clear: defamation occurs when a wrongful and intentional publication damages someone’s reputation. The essentials are:
• Publication to a third party
• Defamatory meaning that harms reputation
• Wrongful and intentional conduct
Key defences include:
1. Truth in the public interest
2. Qualified privilege (for example, court reporting)
3. Fair comment on matters of public concern
But in practice, large media houses often wield these defences like a shield, even when the information published is, in reality, misleading or outright false.
⸻
How Defamation Is Weaponized
In my experience, these entities — from so-called investigators like Mike Bolhuis, to journalists such as Inna Opperman, and platforms like Netwerk 24 and Rapport — publish sensational, unverified claims under the guise of “public interest.” Once published, the information is echoed across news cycles, social media, and gossip forums until it takes on the appearance of truth.
The tragedy is that the victims are left to fight uphill battles. Legal actions take years, while reputations are destroyed overnight. The networks responsible often use shelf companies or shadowy corporate structures, insulating themselves from personal liability.
⸻
Case Law vs. Reality
South African courts have developed strong principles on balancing defamation with freedom of expression. Cases like:
• Media24 v Nhleko & Mthembu (2023) — showing the need for precision and accountability in media defences.
• Mineral Sands Resources v Reddell (2022-2023) — where the Constitutional Court recognized the abuse of lawsuits (SLAPP) as a tool to silence critics.
• Sithole & Maile v News24 (2023) — where businessmen tried to gag the press but were shut down by the courts.
Yet, despite these developments, the truth is that ordinary citizens and even high-profile professionals rarely succeed in holding defamers accountable. The legal framework exists, but enforcement is elusive.
⸻
The “Derail Peet & Mel Syndrome”
For more than a decade, I have been on the receiving end of coordinated attempts to discredit me. Fake investigators. False reports. Media houses amplifying sensationalism. It has been relentless.
The cost? Personal stress, professional disruption, and the erosion of trust with clients and the public. And yet, not one of these defamers — not Bolhuis, not Opperman, not Netwerk 24, not Rapport — has faced proper liability for their role in publishing or enabling falsehoods.
⸻
The Path to Justice
If you face similar attacks, you must:
1. Document everything — dates, headlines, false statements, screenshots.
2. Seek legal recourse — civil claims under the actio iniuriarum, complaints to the Press Council.
3. Challenge corruption — expose the use of shelf companies or evasive corporate tactics.
4. Tell your own story — don’t let others define you through lies.
⸻
Conclusion
Defamation in South Africa is not just about words; it is about power, networks, and influence. When individuals like Mike Bolhuis and Inna Opperman, and media giants like Netwerk 24 and Rapport, participate in fake news, the damage goes far beyond the individual victim. It erodes public trust in journalism, justice, and accountability.
For me, this battle has lasted since 2011 — a stark reminder that truth in South Africa often comes second to headlines. But I will continue to stand against this machinery of fake news and corruption, and I believe others must too.